THE LOGICAL PROBLEM OF EVIL IN ISLAM AND CHRISTIANITY: A Comparative Approach in the Thought System of Ibn Sînâ and Richard Swinburne

Mukhammad Zamzami, Abdullah HosseiniEskandian, Aabas Aabaszadeh, Muktafi Muktafi

Abstract


Abstract: The study of the ideas of Ibn Sînâ and Richard Swinburne as the pioneers of Islamic philosophy and the West philosophy, and on the other hand, the existing scholastic and ideological differences, is something that can help us to become more familiar with the thoughts of these philosophers and intellectual differences and similarities. In this research, with the analytical method and using the necessary documents, the nature, types, and solutions of evil in the thought of Ibn Sînâ and Swinburne are examined, and also the two philosophers’ thoughts about evil are compared. Both philosophers have considered the existence of evil not in contradiction with the divine attributes, but it is necessary for the acquisition of good, the minimum existence of which is necessary for the best system of creation.
 
Abstrak: Kajian terhadap pemikiran Ibn Sînâ dan Richard Swinburne tentang kejahatan menjadi menarik untuk dianalisis karena perbedaan horizon berpikir keduanya. Jika Ibn Sînâ mewakili tradisi filsafat Islam, maka Richard Swinburne dianggap mewakili filsafat Barat kontemporer. Dalam artikel ini, penulis menganalisis dari dokumen kepustakaan yang diperlukan, baik tentang sifat, jenis, dan solusi atas kejahatan menurut pandangan Ibn Sînâ dan Swinburne. Bagi kedua filsuf, eksistensi kejahatan tidak bertentangan dengan sifat-sifat ilahi, tetapi ia diperlukan untuk memperoleh kebaikan dan keberadaan minimum yang diperlukan untuk sistem penciptaan perbuatan terbaik.


Keywords: evil, Ibn Sînâ, Richard Swinburne, Divine attributes, world of creation


Keywords


Evil, Ibn Sīnā, Richard Swinburne, Divine Attributes, The World of Creation.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aei, Khalil Sultan. “A Study and Comparison of Evil from the Perspective of Augustine and Ibn Sina.” Journal of Philosophical Research 5, no. 9, (2010).

Alizamani, Amir Abbas and Hashemi, Fateme Sadat. “Augustine’s Theory on the Problem of Evil and Its Critique from Ibn Sina’s Perspective.” Avicennian Philosophy 19, no. 54, (2016).

Beheshti, Ahmad. Tajrîd. Qom: Book Garden Institute, 2010.

Lataster, Raphael. “On Richard Swinburne and the Failings of Christian Theistic Evidentialism.” Literature and Aesthetics 26, (2016).

Leftow, Brian. “Swinburne on Divine Necessity”, in Religious Studies 46, No. 2, (2010). http://www.jstor.org/stable/25676934.

Mackie, J.L. “Evil and Omnipotence.” Mind 64, (1955).

Maryam, Solgi. “A Comparative Study of Suhrawardi and Swinburne on the Problem of Evil.” Andishe-e-Novin-e-Dini 14, no. 54, (2008).

Meisami, Sayeh. “Ibn Sînâ’s Philosophical Interpretation of Sûrat al-Falaq.” al-Bayan: Journal of Qur’an and Hadith Studies 15, no. 1, (2017). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/22321969-12340043.

Motahhari, Morteza. Divine Justice. Tehran: Sadra Publications, 1983.

Nooshabadi, Akram Khalili. God of Love and the Problem of Evil: Description, Review, and Critique of the Theological Irenaeus and the Cultivation of the Soul of John Hick. Qom: Taha Cultural Institute, 2016.

O’Connor, David. “Swinburne on Natural Evil from Natural Processes.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 30, no. 2, (1991). http://www.jstor.org/stable/40020283.

Plantinga, Alvin. The Nature of Necessity. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1974.

Pourhassan, Gh. and Damaneh, H. Eskandari. “Comparison of Motahhari and Swinburne’s Views on the Problem of Evil.” Philosophy of Religion (Nameh Hekmat) 12, no. 2, (2014).

Rowe, William L. “The Evidential Argument from Evil: A Second Look”, in Daniel Howard-Snyder (ed.), The Evidential Argument from Evil. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1996.

Rowe, William L. “Evil and Theodicy.” Philosophical Topics 16, (1988).

Sadeghi, Maryam. “The View of Three Muslim Wise Men on the Issue of Evil.” Sinai Philosophy: Quarterly Journal of the Seventeenth Year (2013).

Shihadeh, Ayman. “Avicenna’s Theodicy and al-Râzî’s Anti-Theodicy”, in Intellectual History of the Islamicate World 7, no. 1, (2019). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/2212943X-00701004.

Sînâ, Ibn. al-Ishârât wa al-Tanbîhât. Qom: Ayatollah Marashi Najafi Library, 1993.

Sînâ, Ibn. al-Najâh, ed. Mohammad Taghi Daneshpajooh. Tehran: University of Tehran Press, 1986.

Sînâ, Ibn. al-Ta‘lîqât, ed. ‘Abd al-Rahmân Badawî. Qom: Islamic Media School, 1982.

Spinoza, Baruch. Ethics, translated by Mohsen Jahangiri. Tehran: University Publishing Center, 1997.

Stump, Eleonore. “Knowledge, Freedom and the Problem of Evil.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 14, no. 1, (1983). http://www.jstor.org/stable/40012592.

Swinburne, Richard. Providence and the Problem of Evil. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.

Swinburne, Richard. “Natural Evil.” American Philosophical Quarterly 15, no. 4, (1978). http://www.jstor.org/stable/20009727.

Swinburne, Richard. “Theodicy, Our Well-Being, and God’s Rights”, in International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 38, No. 1/3, (1995). http://www.jstor.org/stable/40020330.

Warburton, Nigel. The Alphabet of Philosophy, translated by Massoud Olya. Tehran: Ghoghnos Publications, 2010.

Yazdani, A. “A Critique of Swinburne’s Theological Theory of Divine Justice in the Problem of Evil”, in Collection of Islamic Philosophy and Theology 46, No. 2, (2014).




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30821/miqot.v45i1.823

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Indexed by: